---
product_id: 11611659
title: "Freefall: America, Free Markets, and the Sinking of the World Economy"
price: "€ 20.06"
currency: EUR
in_stock: true
reviews_count: 7
url: https://www.desertcart.sk/products/11611659-freefall-america-free-markets-and-the-sinking-of-the-world
store_origin: SK
region: Slovakia
---

# Freefall: America, Free Markets, and the Sinking of the World Economy

**Price:** € 20.06
**Availability:** ✅ In Stock

## Quick Answers

- **What is this?** Freefall: America, Free Markets, and the Sinking of the World Economy
- **How much does it cost?** € 20.06 with free shipping
- **Is it available?** Yes, in stock and ready to ship
- **Where can I buy it?** [www.desertcart.sk](https://www.desertcart.sk/products/11611659-freefall-america-free-markets-and-the-sinking-of-the-world)

## Best For

- Customers looking for quality international products

## Why This Product

- Free international shipping included
- Worldwide delivery with tracking
- 15-day hassle-free returns

## Description

Freefall: America, Free Markets, and the Sinking of the World Economy [Stiglitz, Joseph E.] on desertcart.com. *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. Freefall: America, Free Markets, and the Sinking of the World Economy

Review: A fascinating and broad reaching book that is full of brilliant insights and observations - This is an excellent book because it is very broad and comprehensive in its treatment of the recent 2007-2008 financial crisis but also because Stiglitz discusses the international consequences and the impact such a financial disaster should have on the field and study of economics. Stiglitz discusses the five primary underlying causes of the 2007-2008 financial crisis as bad lending practices, fees and incentives allowed mortgage originators and others to ignore the weaknesses of the underlying mortgages, the collateral was inflated in a housing bubble, the financial institutions were over-leveraged, and a wilderness of new derivatives gave the impression that risks were under control when in fact they had become unsustainable. Stiglitz does not look for villains or try to blame the crisis on moral or personal failures. Rather, he indicates and supports his contention that this was a systemic failure put into place by failure to correctly estimate the dangers of deregulation and to manage the incentive systems so that moral hazard was controlled rather than increased. Stiglitz is a structuralist who does not wallow in terms like ‘greed’ which is so evident in the popular press. In Stiglitz’s view, greed cannot be addressed but incentives and opportunities for greed can be. He takes a systemic structural view to how the crisis came about and how the crisis should be addressed. Stiglitz also is able to contextualize the crisis by pointing out data regarding how wages for the middle and lower-middle classes has stagnated since around 1981. More women entered the workforce which allowed families to maintain a stable standard of living but this required two wage earners for each household rather than one. As wages and standards of living stagnated for almost 25 years, home equity increased and equity withdrawals allowed middle income homes to maintain their standard of living. Stiglitz is an extremely well organized writer. For example he outlines the content of a good mortgage product: low interest rates, low transaction fees, predictable payments, no hidden costs, and protection against value loss or job loss. Stiglitz points out that financial markets should serve a societal good, like hospitals or schools or utility companies. Financial markets should optimally allocate under used capital for production and innovation while managing risks and maintaining low reasonable transaction fees. Stiglitz thinks these financial markets failed. There should be cause for concern around the financial health of the United States when in 2007 41% of all corporate profit was generated by financial firms. Support for innovations weakened in a market environment in which innovations that circumvented regulation and oversight gathered the focus of the financial industry. Stiglitz builds the case that efforts to blame the government for the 2007-2008 financial crises are insubstantial. Ironically the financial instruments used against the lower working classes eventually brought down the financial institutions themselves. Efforts to deregulate and weaken government oversight resulted in the United States owning the largest automobile and insurance companies in the world. Stiglitz points out those subsidies to financial corporations make the economic system less efficient and these subsidies when to financial firms which had gone to great lengths to avoid paying their fair share of taxes. Another irony pointed out by Stiglitz was that executive contracts at AIG were fully honored despite huge losses because the case was made that the government should not undermine contracts, whereas the union contracts at GM were undermined and had to be re-negotiated. One sentence from the book summarizes this: The 7 largest financial firms had losses of 100 billion dollars, were bailed out by the government with 175 billion dollars, and then gave the very executives that created the crisis 33 billion in bonuses. This book spends a reasonable amount of time on the financial crisis but then analyzes the recovery and stimulus strategies. Stiglitz points out that a crisis does not destroy the underlying assets of an economy- physical plants, natural resources, the knowledge and skills of the workforce, technical knowledge and technologies are all still there. He points out the necessary ingredients for a successful stimulus package which would include: fast action and implementation, use of the multiplier effect to spread the impact of the stimulus, address long term infrastructural problems, invest in the future through research and innovation, should be fair to the middle class working families not just the affluent, should provide relief for short term hardships and should target job loss. Stiglitz makes the case that the stimulus package after the 2007-2008 crisis was too small and only spread out the pain of a slow recovery. Stiglitz is also critical of the lack-luster efforts to restructure financial markets by stopping casino type risks in derivative markets that result in little if any larger societal good. Further, Stiglitz spends considerable effort to explain multiple strategies that could have been undertaken for homeowners other than foreclosures, none of which were pursued. There was a clear tendency to blame the financially illiterate lower middle classes for the crisis when responsibility lay with the financial industry infrastructure and its perverse incentives. Mortgage originators and banks engaged in poor risk assessments and predatory lending practices – yet most government rescue efforts went to those who perpetuated the crisis. Stiglitz points out that capitalism is an extremely robust economic model. It defeated feudalism during the middle ages. It can withstand high levels of inequality but eventually if private rewards are inverse to societal needs, then the entire system is in jeopardy. Stiglitz has studied the impact of unequal knowledge in market transactions and finds that imperfect and asymmetric information challenges the concept of transparent equitable market transactions. Therefore the interest of the consumer should be a government responsibility. Financial markets, in Stiglitz’s view, should benefit society as a whole by better allocation of capital to the most productive enterprise and to better manage risks. The financial crisis of 2007-2008 demonstrates that these markets failed. Their executives were rewarded with astronomical salaries and bonuses because they were supposed to know how to manage risks and they failed. Stiglitz points out that if these major financial firms were too big to fail, then they were too expensive to save and too big to manage. In fact, the failure of Lehman Brothers demonstrated these firms were unable to calculate their own worth. Lehman Brothers was showing 26 billion in assets on their books when in fact they had over 200 billion in losses. Stiglitz finds the argument that TARP was necessary to strengthen the firms that managed most of American’s pension funds. He points out those retired and retiring tax payers would benefit more if the TARP money had been used to strengthen Social Security. I found the book to be fascinating and far reaching with sections on how stock options for executives dilute share owner equity, the use of off-shore money havens that help support terrorist activities, and the Glass-Stegall act of 1933 that built a firewall between commercial and investment banking. Like Kaynes, Galbraith, and Krugman, Stiglitz does not think markets are self correcting. He points out that the irony of the Reagan-Thatcher approach to less government regulation led to more government control.
Review: An extremely important book - Generally, Joseph Stiglitz does a good, but tortuous job, of dissecting the problem and puncturing the arguments of the free market proponents. The first third of this book dwells on the many factors at play that precipitated the crises. Milton Friedman and the 'Chicago Boys', are particularly singled out for their part in creating the intellectual environment that nurtured and fed the build-up to the crises over the last 30 years or so. In the end, it's clear that special interests, an unhealthy and incestuous relationship between Washington (both Republican and Democrat) and Wall street, and the blind belief of the right in the ability of markets to self govern and self correct combined to create a dangerous cocktail that culminated in the collapse of the financial system and misery for millions across the globe. The shocking amounts of tax payer money both in America and the UK thrown at rescuing the fat cat investment banks are contrasted clearly by Stiglitz with America's handling of the Asian financial crises of the late 90's and developing nations at large, leading him to correctly question the fundamental morality of American Free Market Capitalism. His conclusion is damning to say the least. Throughout the book, Stiglitz is at pains to emphasize the impact of the banking crises on the lives or ordinary people, and how they will bare the financial burden in the long run. I also found this book very depressing. Stiglitz outlines the seemingly intractable problems America faces in the next twenty years that require serious thought and action. The depressing part is that the Right continues to propose the very medicine that will make the problems even worse, making the wealthier richer, and average Joe poorer and ultimately sinking America. Does America have the sense to see through the key issues of special interests, the rise of the corporate welfare state, the decline of the middle class and the issues of its corrupted economic and political system? Stiglitz, like Robert Reich in 'Super Capitalism', shows how lobbyists, at the behest of Wall Street and big business in general, have inveigled their way into the very fabric of American democracy to subvert it to the cause of big business, and in the process disenfranchising ordinary Americans, taking from them their chance of a better life. The American dream is no more. It has to be rebuilt. Period. The tragedy is, if the warnings in this book are not heeded, and an enlightened approach to government (read: curbing or outlawing of Government lobbying), economic management (read: capitalism within a strong and proactive regulatory regime), and an end is put to corporate `welfarism', America will continue on the path of long term economic and social decline. The last quarter of the book discusses in layman's terms the debates raging within the economics profession. It seems that the Keynesian view of how the economy functions slipped out of vogue in the early 70's to be replaced by monetarism which found its expression in the policies of Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher and ultimately led to where we find ourselves as a society now. In terms of writing style, this book is heavy going, and could have been better organized in my view. Many Centrists and enlightened thinkers will no doubt look to Stiglitz to provide a moral and intellectual compass with which to argue their case, so I feel an opportunity to present a more structured argument to support them has been lost because of the way this book is organized. I also feel Stiglitz should have used more graphs, tables and illustrations to make his point. Having said that, the reference section at the rear of the book is quite comprehensive, and for those inclined, provides a valuable resource for further research. An extremely important book.

## Technical Specifications

| Specification | Value |
|---------------|-------|
| Best Sellers Rank | #1,544,028 in Books ( See Top 100 in Books ) #763 in International Economics (Books) #1,474 in Economic Conditions (Books) #5,677 in Finance (Books) |
| Customer Reviews | 4.3 4.3 out of 5 stars (244) |
| Dimensions  | 5.5 x 1.2 x 8.3 inches |
| Edition  | Reprint |
| ISBN-10  | 0393338959 |
| ISBN-13  | 978-0393338959 |
| Item Weight  | 13.6 ounces |
| Language  | English |
| Print length  | 480 pages |
| Publication date  | October 4, 2010 |
| Publisher  | W. W. Norton & Company |

## Images

![Freefall: America, Free Markets, and the Sinking of the World Economy - Image 1](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/61ANyYt83mL.jpg)

## Customer Reviews

### ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ A fascinating and broad reaching book that is full of brilliant insights and observations
*by C***S on March 25, 2014*

This is an excellent book because it is very broad and comprehensive in its treatment of the recent 2007-2008 financial crisis but also because Stiglitz discusses the international consequences and the impact such a financial disaster should have on the field and study of economics. Stiglitz discusses the five primary underlying causes of the 2007-2008 financial crisis as bad lending practices, fees and incentives allowed mortgage originators and others to ignore the weaknesses of the underlying mortgages, the collateral was inflated in a housing bubble, the financial institutions were over-leveraged, and a wilderness of new derivatives gave the impression that risks were under control when in fact they had become unsustainable. Stiglitz does not look for villains or try to blame the crisis on moral or personal failures. Rather, he indicates and supports his contention that this was a systemic failure put into place by failure to correctly estimate the dangers of deregulation and to manage the incentive systems so that moral hazard was controlled rather than increased. Stiglitz is a structuralist who does not wallow in terms like ‘greed’ which is so evident in the popular press. In Stiglitz’s view, greed cannot be addressed but incentives and opportunities for greed can be. He takes a systemic structural view to how the crisis came about and how the crisis should be addressed. Stiglitz also is able to contextualize the crisis by pointing out data regarding how wages for the middle and lower-middle classes has stagnated since around 1981. More women entered the workforce which allowed families to maintain a stable standard of living but this required two wage earners for each household rather than one. As wages and standards of living stagnated for almost 25 years, home equity increased and equity withdrawals allowed middle income homes to maintain their standard of living. Stiglitz is an extremely well organized writer. For example he outlines the content of a good mortgage product: low interest rates, low transaction fees, predictable payments, no hidden costs, and protection against value loss or job loss. Stiglitz points out that financial markets should serve a societal good, like hospitals or schools or utility companies. Financial markets should optimally allocate under used capital for production and innovation while managing risks and maintaining low reasonable transaction fees. Stiglitz thinks these financial markets failed. There should be cause for concern around the financial health of the United States when in 2007 41% of all corporate profit was generated by financial firms. Support for innovations weakened in a market environment in which innovations that circumvented regulation and oversight gathered the focus of the financial industry. Stiglitz builds the case that efforts to blame the government for the 2007-2008 financial crises are insubstantial. Ironically the financial instruments used against the lower working classes eventually brought down the financial institutions themselves. Efforts to deregulate and weaken government oversight resulted in the United States owning the largest automobile and insurance companies in the world. Stiglitz points out those subsidies to financial corporations make the economic system less efficient and these subsidies when to financial firms which had gone to great lengths to avoid paying their fair share of taxes. Another irony pointed out by Stiglitz was that executive contracts at AIG were fully honored despite huge losses because the case was made that the government should not undermine contracts, whereas the union contracts at GM were undermined and had to be re-negotiated. One sentence from the book summarizes this: The 7 largest financial firms had losses of 100 billion dollars, were bailed out by the government with 175 billion dollars, and then gave the very executives that created the crisis 33 billion in bonuses. This book spends a reasonable amount of time on the financial crisis but then analyzes the recovery and stimulus strategies. Stiglitz points out that a crisis does not destroy the underlying assets of an economy- physical plants, natural resources, the knowledge and skills of the workforce, technical knowledge and technologies are all still there. He points out the necessary ingredients for a successful stimulus package which would include: fast action and implementation, use of the multiplier effect to spread the impact of the stimulus, address long term infrastructural problems, invest in the future through research and innovation, should be fair to the middle class working families not just the affluent, should provide relief for short term hardships and should target job loss. Stiglitz makes the case that the stimulus package after the 2007-2008 crisis was too small and only spread out the pain of a slow recovery. Stiglitz is also critical of the lack-luster efforts to restructure financial markets by stopping casino type risks in derivative markets that result in little if any larger societal good. Further, Stiglitz spends considerable effort to explain multiple strategies that could have been undertaken for homeowners other than foreclosures, none of which were pursued. There was a clear tendency to blame the financially illiterate lower middle classes for the crisis when responsibility lay with the financial industry infrastructure and its perverse incentives. Mortgage originators and banks engaged in poor risk assessments and predatory lending practices – yet most government rescue efforts went to those who perpetuated the crisis. Stiglitz points out that capitalism is an extremely robust economic model. It defeated feudalism during the middle ages. It can withstand high levels of inequality but eventually if private rewards are inverse to societal needs, then the entire system is in jeopardy. Stiglitz has studied the impact of unequal knowledge in market transactions and finds that imperfect and asymmetric information challenges the concept of transparent equitable market transactions. Therefore the interest of the consumer should be a government responsibility. Financial markets, in Stiglitz’s view, should benefit society as a whole by better allocation of capital to the most productive enterprise and to better manage risks. The financial crisis of 2007-2008 demonstrates that these markets failed. Their executives were rewarded with astronomical salaries and bonuses because they were supposed to know how to manage risks and they failed. Stiglitz points out that if these major financial firms were too big to fail, then they were too expensive to save and too big to manage. In fact, the failure of Lehman Brothers demonstrated these firms were unable to calculate their own worth. Lehman Brothers was showing 26 billion in assets on their books when in fact they had over 200 billion in losses. Stiglitz finds the argument that TARP was necessary to strengthen the firms that managed most of American’s pension funds. He points out those retired and retiring tax payers would benefit more if the TARP money had been used to strengthen Social Security. I found the book to be fascinating and far reaching with sections on how stock options for executives dilute share owner equity, the use of off-shore money havens that help support terrorist activities, and the Glass-Stegall act of 1933 that built a firewall between commercial and investment banking. Like Kaynes, Galbraith, and Krugman, Stiglitz does not think markets are self correcting. He points out that the irony of the Reagan-Thatcher approach to less government regulation led to more government control.

### ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ An extremely important book
*by P***H on March 17, 2010*

Generally, Joseph Stiglitz does a good, but tortuous job, of dissecting the problem and puncturing the arguments of the free market proponents. The first third of this book dwells on the many factors at play that precipitated the crises. Milton Friedman and the 'Chicago Boys', are particularly singled out for their part in creating the intellectual environment that nurtured and fed the build-up to the crises over the last 30 years or so. In the end, it's clear that special interests, an unhealthy and incestuous relationship between Washington (both Republican and Democrat) and Wall street, and the blind belief of the right in the ability of markets to self govern and self correct combined to create a dangerous cocktail that culminated in the collapse of the financial system and misery for millions across the globe. The shocking amounts of tax payer money both in America and the UK thrown at rescuing the fat cat investment banks are contrasted clearly by Stiglitz with America's handling of the Asian financial crises of the late 90's and developing nations at large, leading him to correctly question the fundamental morality of American Free Market Capitalism. His conclusion is damning to say the least. Throughout the book, Stiglitz is at pains to emphasize the impact of the banking crises on the lives or ordinary people, and how they will bare the financial burden in the long run. I also found this book very depressing. Stiglitz outlines the seemingly intractable problems America faces in the next twenty years that require serious thought and action. The depressing part is that the Right continues to propose the very medicine that will make the problems even worse, making the wealthier richer, and average Joe poorer and ultimately sinking America. Does America have the sense to see through the key issues of special interests, the rise of the corporate welfare state, the decline of the middle class and the issues of its corrupted economic and political system? Stiglitz, like Robert Reich in 'Super Capitalism', shows how lobbyists, at the behest of Wall Street and big business in general, have inveigled their way into the very fabric of American democracy to subvert it to the cause of big business, and in the process disenfranchising ordinary Americans, taking from them their chance of a better life. The American dream is no more. It has to be rebuilt. Period. The tragedy is, if the warnings in this book are not heeded, and an enlightened approach to government (read: curbing or outlawing of Government lobbying), economic management (read: capitalism within a strong and proactive regulatory regime), and an end is put to corporate `welfarism', America will continue on the path of long term economic and social decline. The last quarter of the book discusses in layman's terms the debates raging within the economics profession. It seems that the Keynesian view of how the economy functions slipped out of vogue in the early 70's to be replaced by monetarism which found its expression in the policies of Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher and ultimately led to where we find ourselves as a society now. In terms of writing style, this book is heavy going, and could have been better organized in my view. Many Centrists and enlightened thinkers will no doubt look to Stiglitz to provide a moral and intellectual compass with which to argue their case, so I feel an opportunity to present a more structured argument to support them has been lost because of the way this book is organized. I also feel Stiglitz should have used more graphs, tables and illustrations to make his point. Having said that, the reference section at the rear of the book is quite comprehensive, and for those inclined, provides a valuable resource for further research. An extremely important book.

### ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Review
*by A***A on April 30, 2019*

Joseph Stiglitz explains economic nitty-gritties for the layman. Complex terms, products, and dealings are simplified so well that the reader fully or near fully understands what happened in 2008 and the years before and after it. I have read several great books on the subject and this has been the best of all. Stiglitz discusses what went wrong and why and proposes solutions for the future. He also tells how likely those solutions are.

---

## Why Shop on Desertcart?

- 🛒 **Trusted by 1.3+ Million Shoppers** — Serving international shoppers since 2016
- 🌍 **Shop Globally** — Access 737+ million products across 21 categories
- 💰 **No Hidden Fees** — All customs, duties, and taxes included in the price
- 🔄 **15-Day Free Returns** — Hassle-free returns (30 days for PRO members)
- 🔒 **Secure Payments** — Trusted payment options with buyer protection
- ⭐ **TrustPilot Rated 4.5/5** — Based on 8,000+ happy customer reviews

**Shop now:** [https://www.desertcart.sk/products/11611659-freefall-america-free-markets-and-the-sinking-of-the-world](https://www.desertcart.sk/products/11611659-freefall-america-free-markets-and-the-sinking-of-the-world)

---

*Product available on Desertcart Slovakia*
*Store origin: SK*
*Last updated: 2026-02-18*