Anacondas: Trail of Blood

Lots of chase scenes, totally CGI snake, some humor but pretty good story line and fun to watch.

I had to complete the set. That's my excuse.This movie takes over where the third one left off. Not all the snakes were killed in the last movie. A different but equally dopey scientist experiments with the remaining snake and creates a hybrid that can regenerate from itsy-bitsy blown apart pieces. Cool. Recycling at its finest. The story is also a rehash (waste not want not). They've gathered several groups of bodies-to-be in a forest where they run around trying to avoid each other and the snake. There are bodies to begin with, from a dig site. Crystal Allen returns as Dr. Amanda Hayes, still paying penance for the original snakes. If the object was to rectify her mistake so more people don't die, then she fails miserably in this sequel as lots more people die horrible cartoonish deaths at the snake's behest (this includes the EVIL billionaire Murdoch, played again by John Rhys-Davies in sleep-mode, a snake in his own right). There are murderous mercenaries galore, scientists aplenty, and one lone hiker in for the run of his life. I'd like to say they don't make movies like this anymore but they do, and often. It does feature a car chase with the snake in hot pursuit. It almost looks lifelike. So do the majority of the (ahem) actors involved. Movies like this are all about the action and the gruesome deaths. Sadly, there wasn't nearly enough action and the FX/CGI effects limited the amount of grue. Still, I found it entertaining enough and it finishes off the series (while leaving it wide open for another sequel that never materialized). Filmed in lovely Romania. What more could you want? (Besides a better movie.)

Early in the film someone said it would revolutionize medicine if properly applied. When has that ever happened in a movie? There wouldn’t be any movie. This is not a good movie, mainly because it is confusing. For one thing, since when do snakes hiss, growl and roar? Anyway, they went out of their way to make it obvious in plot points when a character made a mistake, especially when they dropped something. The CGI is at best, only mediocre, but the forest setting is really beautiful. There are really three sets of people involved. The woman wanting to destroy the orchids, the group set to kill her, and a third group that seemed to just happen to be there in the area. Passable way to pass the time, but that is about it.

I truly don't get why alot of reviewers are so hard on these kinds of movies. To look for somekind of high-budget masterpiece here is like climbing a tree in search of a fish!First, this is a made for tv movie and it is a b-movie/(small-budget).For what it is Anacondas: Trail of Blood is not bad.The story takes place in the Carpathian Mountains of Eastern Europe, some rich guy wants to live long and overcome his physical condition so he invests lots of money in some kind of private out of the way pharmaceutical lab to extract from an orchid plant a promising new drug. The lab experiments with snakes and a side effect is a very big hungry snake that breaks loose in the local surrounding woods eating people! Scientist lady and team go out to find it and destroy it.Yeah, that's it folks - Anacondas: Trail of Blood dosen't pretend to be some important movie that's going to set a new standard for the movie world or change the world. And that's exactly why i liked it. I get tired of self-important big "showcase" movies. Now the story does carry a sort of message like; 'don't mess with nature' - a Frankenstein kind of thing but without preaching about it.Bottom line; I found this movie to be scary good fun. Just don't get to hung-up on how good or bad the CGI is, and you might very well enjoy it. The people and relationships in it are interesting; especially that of Amanda's platonic love for Alex and the more romantic love of Jackson & Heather and the age difference between these adults. (I'm guessing Amanda is in her early 30s and Alex is about 21/Jackson 40 and Heather 25?). Both of these relationships are portrayed in a meaningful way.Anacondas: The Hunt for the Blood Orchid is also good.

Once again story line is good. Once again looks fake and bad acting too in this one.

Great condition and works well

I enjoyed it all the way through. 1st watch 04/06/2021.

Ever since I saw the first one I was intrigued, especially when I found out that anacondas actually are real, (except they don't get as huge as the movie says). lol Then when I started buying the series I really got into them! lol I loved the movie and then I loved "saga". The first one I recorded off of t.v. Some day I may try to get that one "store bought" too!

der film ist sehenswert.

Der letzte Teil der Anaconda-Reihe hat sich erlaubt noch etwas schlechter zu sein als Teil 3. Ich möchte gleich sagen, dass ich ein großer Fan der ersten beiden Teile bin und nichts gegen Trash habe. Aber man hätte sich das geld für Teil 4 ruhig sparen können, es in Teil 3 investieren können und damit einen guten Teil 3 hinlegen können.

Der andere Anacondas Teil ist wesentlich besser. Dieser Film ist nicht das was man unbedingt sehen sollte. Wenn man ihn irgendwo einmal zu sehen bekommt ohne ihn zu kaufen ist das mehr als ausreichend.

Mist

Gefählt mir da ich sie sammele und meine Jungen Zeiten erinnere da man so was nicht vergessen möchte das sind meine Filme