Open Society: Reforming Global Capitalism

George Soros' latest book, Open Society: Reforming Global Capitalism, is an updated version of his philosophy--philosophy being an unending search for wisdom. The billions he made from his wise investments in the stock market did not make him part of the problem, but part of the solution. He became a philanthropist, putting his money into a worldwide organization meant to support democracy and human rights in over 70 countries.In his overly long introduction, he apologizes for perhaps covering too much ground, but there can never be too much evidence. As working on his theory of evolution had been Darwin's whole life and summed up in his book, so too has Soros' theory of human behavior. It is not just open societies that he promotes, but also open minds. It is bound to be even more controversial than evolution due to our egotistical notion that we already know the truth about ourselves.As his primary interest is in saving our country from bankruptcy, he begins with the imperfections that concern our status as leaders of the whole world. Business, he says, is conducted for private gain, and is not designed to safeguard universal principles; our "freedoms" are being threatened by the "unbridled pursuit of self-interest" on the part of our leaders. What has come about is an unholy alliance between government and business.He began his philosophical search for the truth by examining his own shortcomings. His predictions had not been totally right due to miscalculations on his part--he was accused of crying wolf once too often. Looking back he saw that he believed that he was right about coming crisis; it was the timing that was wrong. Seeing that he was fallible, not infallible, he surmised that this was an ongoing universal problem. (Socrates called it hubris.)It seems the basic things we learn about ourselves apply to human nature. It is earthshaking to believe that we might be wrong, but when we start to think about it, what we have gained is an open mind.He makes up for his tedious background information, which was necessary for those, like myself, who knew nothing about the man or his books, by summing up the problem of a closed mind in the first paragraph of the first chapter. It seems we can live in an open society, and still be close-minded."The concept of open society," he says, "is based on the recognition that our understanding of the world is inherently imperfect. Those who claim to be in possession of the ultimate truth are making a false claim, and they can enforce it only by imposing their views on those who differ...Acting on that understanding, we can create a society that is open to never-ending improvement. Open society falls short of perfection, but it has the great merit of assuring freedom of thought and speech and giving ample scope to experimentation and creativity."While he had never been worried about his reputation--he has been accused of being a communist for trying to save capitalism--he did come to see the importance of public opinion. He had to get the voting public to understand the problem. By adjusting his style (or seeing the importance of rhetoric) he became a popular speaker. What he also saw was that rhetoric, when used to further ulterior motives, becomes a way of becoming popular by crying wolf deliberately--the "common enemy" needing to be destroyed--the "infallible savior" being a do-gooder whose ways and means become the cause of his undoing.While Soros has no faith in reasoning, this is exactly what he was doing when he was thinking rationally. Wouldn't an Open Society Alliance, seeking for improvement in relationships between countries ultimately restore our reputation as a beacon of light, and also bring about a consensus of opinion? Haven't all wars been caused by those forcing their opinions on others--we, being the chief offenders, having been do-gooders bringing ourselves down by our violent ways and means of instilling our way of life?Reading George Soros' book will not make you a rich investor, but, once understood, it will make you an active and wiser citizen, at which time you will no longer be part of the problem but part of the solution. Benjamin Franklin, when asked what had been achieved, a republic or a monarchy, answered, "A republic, if we can keep it."One more thing; Soros credits Karl Popper for giving him the idea of an open society, proving that our advancement has come from stepping on the shoulders of those who came before us. I have just ordered his book "Open Society and It's Enemies" for my own edification.Joan Morrone

Book was received in perfect shape, no dents or folds.

Rambling style of writing

I understood that Soros had come up with a new suggested philosophy of how the world should work and I wanted to know more about it. His proposed Open Society has to me an element of wishing the world would operate in a way different than it has been tried in the past. If everyone could be as nice as he thinks it would be good. Unfortunately I don't think the world is quite ready for such a world as he proposes.There are other parts to the book where he talks about things like currency trading they were very educational as well as interesting.JM

His implementing naturalistic thinking to create absolutes in the historical situational etics of market fluctuations

Know your enemy insightful This plan is why our southern border is open

very eye opening. if you want to know what the left liberals are up to this is it. a must read to wake you up to reality

This is Mr. Evil's plan to eliminate all national borders. By infiltrating legitimate countries with massive numbers of refugees, and illegal immigrants Soros sees the elimination of those country's individual Governments and the establishment of a World Government (with him as king of the world I suppose.) Disregarding the massive human suffering and destruction such a plan causes, he couches his socio and economic purposes in a variety of rationalizations while justifying them as being for the good of the world. I guess he means the end justifies the means. This guy would be great as a megalomaniacal villain in a James Bond movie.The reformation of global capitalism he refers to would result in two classes of people in the world, the elites and the herd ... guess which group he would be in.

Soros da su adaptación de las teorías de Popper y como le influye en su modo de actuar. En el habla de su teoría de la reflexividad y hace una apología de sus patrones de actuación tan criticados últimamente por mucha gente. Si pensáis en el lado conspiracionista de soros antes tenéis que leer este libro

The book is in perfect condition.