---
product_id: 5000367
title: "Did Muhammad Exist?: An Inquiry into Islam's Obscure Origins Paperback – September 1, 2014"
brand: "robert spencer"
price: "€ 55.31"
currency: EUR
in_stock: true
reviews_count: 7
url: https://www.desertcart.sk/products/5000367-did-muhammad-exist-an-inquiry-into-islams-obscure-origins-paperback
store_origin: SK
region: Slovakia
---

# Did Muhammad Exist?: An Inquiry into Islam's Obscure Origins Paperback – September 1, 2014

**Brand:** robert spencer
**Price:** € 55.31
**Availability:** ✅ In Stock

## Quick Answers

- **What is this?** Did Muhammad Exist?: An Inquiry into Islam's Obscure Origins Paperback – September 1, 2014 by robert spencer
- **How much does it cost?** € 55.31 with free shipping
- **Is it available?** Yes, in stock and ready to ship
- **Where can I buy it?** [www.desertcart.sk](https://www.desertcart.sk/products/5000367-did-muhammad-exist-an-inquiry-into-islams-obscure-origins-paperback)

## Best For

- robert spencer enthusiasts

## Why This Product

- Trusted robert spencer brand quality
- Free international shipping included
- Worldwide delivery with tracking
- 15-day hassle-free returns

## Description

Full description not available

## Images

![Did Muhammad Exist?: An Inquiry into Islam's Obscure Origins Paperback – September 1, 2014 - Image 1](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/81vKIHDIj2L.jpg)
![Did Muhammad Exist?: An Inquiry into Islam's Obscure Origins Paperback – September 1, 2014 - Image 2](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/91quFFiQMsL.jpg)
![Did Muhammad Exist?: An Inquiry into Islam's Obscure Origins Paperback – September 1, 2014 - Image 3](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/41dCTxyFt5L.jpg)

## Customer Reviews

### ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ 5.0 out of 5 stars







  
  
    Brilliant. Top Notch Stuff!
  

*by F***N on Reviewed in the United States on July 26, 2012*

This book was great. It summed up most of the evidence against the traditional view of the origins of Islam. I was already starting to come to several of these conclusions myself based off on other books I have read, but this book threw the discussion into a whole new ball field. Other books like Philip Jenkins' 
  
The Lost History of Christianity







  
  
     talked about how interesting the rise of Islam was, and how the Muslims converted most of the monophysite Christians from north Africa in only a matter of years. Why was this? He drew the conclusion that it because the Muslims were very similar to a Christian sect during that time period. So coming into this book I admit to having my bias against the proper origins of Islam, but this book was still a fantastic resource that I will probably re-read in the near future.I will go through the eleven different chapters and explain the point and purpose of each, before giving a summary. But do understand that I am just giving a basic overview of each chapter. They are more complex than I can go into in a review:The Full Light of History: This is the introduction chapter, which speaks about how Muhammad is heralded as the only religious leader who is not shrouded in history. He claims that this is not so. "The issue is whether legend supplemented a historical record to the extent that it was no longer possible to determine what was legend and what was history." (p.15)The Man Who Wasn't There: He examines the absence of a Muhammad figure from any non-Islamic historical records, and how the earliest writings containing a record of an "Arabian Prophet" give details that downright contradict an orthodox Islamic view of Muhammad.Jesus, the Muhammad: He talks about how the word "muhammad" actually means "praised one (p.55)." An early text of the Qur'an says, "Muhammad is the servant of God and his messenger." However, this could also be translated, "Praised be the servant of God and his messenger." Mix this with the coins and architecture from this period which have Christian crosses on them and you can interpret this as talking about Jesus, and you can interpret it this way without any strain at all.Inventing Muhammad: So how did Muhammad come about then, if he was just a made up character? It was actually through the use of a type of story called a "hadith." In the power struggle that ensued the fall of the Umayyads, the Abbasids and the Shi'ites both started pumping out hadiths in order to show how Muhammad had credited them as the true rulers while considering the opposing side as betrayers or unworthy. Eventually over 293,000 hadiths were discredited and only around 2,500 of the hadiths were said to be accurate, even when they contradicted each other.Switching on the Full Light of History: Apparently, the first biographer of Muhammad, whose biography all others are based on, didn't write his biography until around 125 years after the death of Muhammad. He was also not a credible author, and later biographers who supposedly based their biographies off of his added details and embellished points. This makes the biographical tradition of Islam un-credible.The Embarrassment of Muhammad: Muhammad has some embarrassing stories. He even supposedly forgot some of the Qur'an in his life, yet this was because "Allah made him forget it on purpose." These embarrassing stories are often used as proof that Muhammad existed (because why embarrass the great prophet?), but Spencer argues that these were left to show that it's okay that recent history doesn't mention anything about Muhammad because he himself forgot stuff and it was divinely mandated. The fact that we all forgot about him in the history books was divinely mandated too. He uses other examples as well.Here the book changes focus away from Muhammad himself and switches to showing how the Qur'an was not written by a single author, and how it does have variants and is not the original revelation to a single person.The Unchanging Qur'an Changes: In this chapter he shows the diversity inside the Qur'an, and how Muhammad himself is said to have had no problem whatsoever with diversity of readings of the Qur'an. He also shows how the order of some Qur'an passages have been rearranged from their original form.The Non-Arabic Arabic Qur'an: This was the chapter that had me hooked. Spencer talks about the nonsense readings of the Qur'an. He talks about how the Qur'an feels the need to consistently say that it was originally in Arabic to a fault, and how there are actually major hints that it was originally in Syriac. For example, the nonsense readings that make no sense in Arabic often make perfect sense in Syriac, and these readings generally do not come out as Islamic readings, but they closely resemble early Christian literature.What the Qur'an Might Have Been: This is where the historical "fact" of the Qur'an being written by Muhammad is brought under scrutiny. It makes the most sense in light of the evidence to say that the Qur'an was originally a Christian lectionary. Even the word "Qur'an" closely resembles the Syriac word for "lectionary." He talks about how it would make sense for this to have been the teachings of Arius, the man from Nicaea who claimed that Jesus was not God, only a messenger of God (A Prophet of God?).Who Collected the Qur'an: Lastly, Spencer shows how the traditional accounts of Uthman collecting the Qur'an is false. "Beyond the fact that the text Uthman supposedly collected does not survive, there is also no mention of the Koran as such in the available literature until early in the eighth century. What's more, although Uthman supposedly burned other versions of the Koran, some variant reading in the Koranic text have survived to the present day. To be sure, none of the extant variants is large, but even the smallest is enough to debunk the Islamic apologetic argument that...the Koranic text is...unaltered, unedited, not tampered with in any way, since the time of its revelation (p.193)." He talks about how the truth of who collected the Qur'an actually leads us to Abd al-Malik and Hajjaj ibn Yusuf. This would have been for the political reason of discrediting the Umayyads, who had never heard of Muhammad and thus needed to be overthrown for the good of Allah (who they said the Umayyads had purposely ignored)!!!Making Sense Of It All: Spencer summarizes all of his points from throughout the book into point format as well as going over the obscure "facts" that are torn down in the book.Overall, this book was extremely interesting. I have heard others say that these are arguments from silence. I would contend that they are not. Here you have motives, not blank "I don't know why they would make him up" scenarios. I have avidly opposed the "mythicists (Jesus never existed)" for some time now because this is the nature of their arguments. "Well we don't see Jesus over every billboard in the first century Middle East, so this small time 'prophet' must have not existed." Also they cannot produce a good motive for the random invention of Jesus other than "because Paul wanted too." This book does not go down to that level. It presents clear arguments that show a clear political motive for the invention of Muhammad.I still think that there was some sort of "Muhammad" figure in history, but this book made a clear and dominant case against the authenticity of the Islamic accounts. Much Recommended.

### ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ 5.0 out of 5 stars







  
  
    Did He?
  

*by D***N on Reviewed in the United States on September 2, 2012*

For the last two centuries, secular and skeptical scholars have attempted to learn about the "historical Jesus", the actual person behind the Gospel accounts, and to develop a secular explanation for the origin of Christianity. This effort necessarily involves some degree skepticism about the traditional accounts of the life and words of Jesus and the apostles found in scripture. There has not really been much of an effort to find the "historical Mohammed" and to reconstruct the early history of Islam.The historian who wishes to investigate the origin of Islam suffers from two disadvantages that the historian of Christianity does not. First, while the evidence for Jesus' life outside the New Testament is scanty, Jesus and the early Christians lived in a literate culture and the earliest Christians writings and non-Christian references to the new religion begin to appear within decades of Jesus' death. Islam, on the other have, began in an almost completely illiterate, predominately oral, culture. The earliest written accounts of the life of Mohammed do not appear until more than a century after his death. These are largely those collections of Mohammed's sayings and deeds called the Hadith, which were transmitted orally for several generations, and even Muslim scholars concede that many are spurious. The Koran is supposed to have been roughly contemporary with Mohammed, but there is good reason to suppose that it too was not collected until more than a century after Mohammed.The second disadvantage that the skeptical scholar of Islam faces is the fact that he literally endangers his life by making inquiries that the followers of the religion of peace disapprove of. For this reason, several scholars are obliged to use pseudonyms or invest in security. Less daring investigators prefer to study less dangerous subjects, such as the origins of Judaism or Christianity, whose followers are noticeably less inclined to murder them when they are offended.For this reason, we have good reason to be thankful that Robert Spencer is willing to take on the subject of the origin of Islam in his latest book, Did Mohammed Exist?  Robert Spencer is not a scholar and offers no original research in writing Did Mohammed Exist.  Instead, he has presented the works of those scholars who have questioned the traditional origin story of Islam in a clear, easily understood manner and convincingly makes the argument that Mohammed, at least in the sense of being the prophet from Mecca, did not exist.Did Mohammed exist?  It may seem an odd question to ask. Surely, there is as much evidence that Mohammed existed as Jesus or Socrates. Even a non-Muslim must concede that, even if he does not believe Mohammed is a prophet. In fact, as Spencer shows, the evidence for Mohammed's life is sparse. As I mentioned above, Muslim accounts of his life are not found until more than a century or more after his death. Non-Muslim chroniclers, although they describe the invasions of the Arab armies, make no mentions of the Arab prophet or of the Koran. Coins minted by the earliest caliphs are more likely to show Christian symbols, rather than quotations from the Koran.Spencer also notes that the Koran is a very strange book in that it is very disordered and many Arabic words don't actually make any sense. This is due, in part, to the fact that the earliest Arabic alphabet did not make distinctions between certain letters and if some of the letters are changed, the text makes more sense. Spencer also notes that much of the Koran may, in fact, have been written in Syriac, a language closely related to Arabic, and again if some words are actually Syriac, than the text makes more sense. (For one thing, those virgins that martyrs are promised are more likely to be white raisins.)As for Mohammed, that name only appears a few times in the Koran. The name means "one who is highly praised" and could be a title rather than a proper name. While it is likely that there was a warlord or prophet with that name or title, the Mohammed of Islam almost certainly did not exist. Spencer shows that the historical evidence simply cannot confirm the traditional accounts. There is much that is contradictory in these accounts and there is much that does not match what is known of the conditions in Arabia in the time that Mohammed is said to have lived. It seems more likely, according to Spencer, that the legend of Mohammed and much of the religion of Islam was created, out of Jewish and Christian traditions in the first century of the Arab Empire as an attempt to provide an Arabic religious ideology to unify the diverse conquered peoples. Whether the reader ends up agreeing with Robert Spencer's thesis or not, they are sure to find Did Mohammed Exist? A thought provoking exploration of the story behind the origins of one of the world's largest religions.

### ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ 







  
  
    Admirable i.e. “a highly politically incorrect” work.
  

*by उ***ड on Reviewed in India on July 15, 2020*

A very well researched,A very scholarly work.I admire the courage of the author to write down a politically incorrect book.I don't have enough words to more glorify this book.

---

## Why Shop on Desertcart?

- 🛒 **Trusted by 1.3+ Million Shoppers** — Serving international shoppers since 2016
- 🌍 **Shop Globally** — Access 737+ million products across 21 categories
- 💰 **No Hidden Fees** — All customs, duties, and taxes included in the price
- 🔄 **15-Day Free Returns** — Hassle-free returns (30 days for PRO members)
- 🔒 **Secure Payments** — Trusted payment options with buyer protection
- ⭐ **TrustPilot Rated 4.5/5** — Based on 8,000+ happy customer reviews

**Shop now:** [https://www.desertcart.sk/products/5000367-did-muhammad-exist-an-inquiry-into-islams-obscure-origins-paperback](https://www.desertcart.sk/products/5000367-did-muhammad-exist-an-inquiry-into-islams-obscure-origins-paperback)

---

*Product available on Desertcart Slovakia*
*Store origin: SK*
*Last updated: 2026-02-08*