7 Full-Length Practice Tests for the Digital SAT®: Transcendence to 1600

It arrived without any damage and in very good condition.

I came into last year's October international test having only taken bluebook practice tests and used a couple of resources (Princeton Review, Vibrant, etc.) I was disappointed to find my score come out 50 points worse on the actual test than on any of the practice tests I took. (670 real versus 710-730 on practice) Then, I solved Test Qube's tests. I scored about 50 points lower on each test. I was impressed by the quality. The tricks the actual test used on logic and graph questions resembled those on Test Qube. I felt like I was finally really training myself for the right thing. Whereas other books seem to pull questions from AI and are full of errors, in Test Qube's entire book, I only came across one minor typo. Ultimately, I ended up taking the actual sat and was surprised to find the final score I ended up on test qube test 6 and 7 to be exactly the same as what I got on the November sat, a 710.In conclusion, if you want a resource that actually prepares you for what to expect test day, there's nothing better than Test Qube.

In all my 30 years as an SAT instructor, I have never seen such a horrible SAT prep book. 60+ dollars down the drain. I just posted one question here, and you can see that the answer choices don’t even match any part of the stimulus. The quoted information in the question stem is not even found in the paragraph! This is just a drop in the bucket; there are hundreds of misleading and erroneous questions in this book, which, by the way, doesn’t even come with an answer-explanation section. It’s nowhere to be found on their website either. You will just confuse yourself further by doing any of the practice tests in this book. It’s a total rip-off. I almost never leave comments here or elsewhere, but this is such a bad source and so replete with mistakes that I felt I had a moral duty to warn unsuspecting people. I wish I had started using it before the window for returns got closed. Do yourself a favor and stay as far away from this book and company as you possible can.

As a math teacher deeply involved in SAT preparation, I am genuinely impressed by the efficacy of this workbook. It “transcends” being a mere compilation of problems, evolving into a tool that can really help students adjust to the new digital SAT style. The substantial array of challenging exercises within makes it an invaluable asset for any earnest student aiming to excel in the quantitative sections of the test. (The difficulty seems intentionally harder than the Blue Book)The standout feature lies in the workbook's seamless integration with the digital SAT format, offering questions that authentically mirror the test-taking experience. At a time when quality questions for the digital SAT are scarce in the market, this resource addresses a crucial need. The workbook is pretty much concise and straight to the point. Although detailed answers and explanations may be absent, the workbook's emphasis on problem-solving and exposure to the digital testing format positions it a valuable and unique resource for those striving to master the quantitative section of the SAT. I hope to see more good things coming from Test-Qube.

After going through the book, I can confidently say that Test Qube, out of all the digital SAT test books out there on the market right now, does the best in creating passages and questions that are similar to the ones in the actual test.Reading Section: As many would know, differentiating between two answers that seem equally valid is the essential skill in scoring high on SAT. Test Qube provides many questions that test such skill.Grammar Section: Test Qube does a great job at providing exposure to confusing grammar questions that even a student who is used to getting almost all questions right on the grammar section could get wrong. Such exposure would definitely help students score high on SAT.Math Section: I would say that Test Qube's questions are so similar to the actual SAT questions that I couldn't really tell the difference. I found a couple problems especially impressive, specifically the suit of cards probability question.

Practice test are kind of similar to digital SAT exam.

I’ve gone through all of the major publishers and I have to say, the only book that was on par with the level of difficulty of the actual test was test qube. I found other books to be too easy especially in regard to logic questions, but I could really tell that test qube’s logic questions were meticulously crafted and difficult. For the math section, I would get zero wrong on bluebook, but one or two wrong on test qube’s tests. This rigor jump is good to prepare for the unexpected. For students new to the sat I would recommend beginning with concept based books and then transitioning to test qube’s navy book. After finishing the tests here, I bought tests 8-11 on test qube’s website. It was good to practice with adaptive modules.

This set of practice tests is a good match for the actual DSAT. The problems may actually be a little harder, but that's good. Covers all the major problem types. Only 2 bad things are that the font is tiny and there are occasional typos. Also, explanations are not given, just answer key. (Think you have to buy the online version to get explanations.) But as long as you can overlook those minor drawbacks, this book is way better than the big name publishers' books. Getting 7 high quality practice tests is more than worth the price.