EmprellaCotton Underwear Women, Seamless Womens Boy Shorts Lace Panties Slip Shorts

Hugs me comfortable! I’m a bigger girl who has a larger bottom and these do NOT cut me in the middle of the cheeks. The lace lays and feels so nice. This may sound exaggerated but I almost forgot I was wearing them. (I’m 190 5’2” and I got a size XL)

These are more Booty Shorts than Boy Shorts! Cute and I will try not to tug them out of my crack all day because fashion, but yeah, Booty Shorts- don't expect the coverage in that picture.

Not what I was looking for nor expected. The size was ok but I guess my definition of shorts is different. My thighs have been rubbing together causing some irritation which is why I was looking for shorts type underwear. From the picture on the model, it covered the area that I needed protecting. When I first put the on they covered the area but the minute I moved it rode up and no longer covered my inner thigh. It seems anyone with a curve to the inner thigh will have this problem. The other issue is the bottom is lace which is cute but very irritating when the thighs rub together or when the bottom rolls up...which is most the time. Would not recommend this for anyone with curves. Would have liked the legs to come lower ... when you hold the product up thr crotch hangs lower than the legs...not my definition of shorts. On an up note, they were comfortable if I didn't move.

OK - I would post a photo but then reconsidered as to how it could be misused. The product information recommends going a size up which I did. But what that meant for me was a panty that had way too much material in the front and not enough on the back, making for a very uncomfortable fit. And unattractive. So to help any future buyer -- here are some details. I am 5'8.5" tall and weigh 192 pounds. I actually still wear size 6 in Jockey panties but I think they are just making their panties larger -- I rarely buy size 7 because they tend to be too baggy. But based on the seller's recommendation, I sized to the XL. Mistake. Stick with the large if you want to try these. Maybe if you are long waisted the fit will be better. I am not, I am short waisted and why I think there was just way too much material in the front. The back even so, lay half way up my buttocks. The seller refunded my money and so there is no complaints in that category. I hope this information helps!

Panties came in cute pack. I'm very excited that the cut is sexy and not too square. I'm 5'6, 170 for reference and I ordered the large. If you want more coverage, I recommend going a size up because they're cheeky.

Super cute. I’ll wear to bed. I’m sure hubby will enjoy :) im 5’1 125lbs and I got the M because I hate when underwear cut off my circulation..plus I’m sure they’ll shrink in the wash.

As suggested in the description, order a size up because these run small. I did. Well.... I believe it's safe to say that they don't run small, because these are a bit large and don't fit very well. I'm saying they run a bit large, because of the disclaimer that they provided in the description.

The quality seems fine, they look as described, my problem is that they are cut exactly the same in the front as the back, so they ride up a lot and can not accommodate a booty. When I first put them on, the front is boy short length, maybe an inch past the business. On the back though, they can't over cheeks. It's super bizarre. Women often have more to cover in the back than in the front, so not sure why they are cut the same!