Air Tube Headset - Upgraded Anti-Radiation Headphones, EMF Protection Metal Binaural Earbuds Earphone with Microphone and Volume Control, Black

They fit very comfortably and I have had no problem keeping them in my ears. I do not have to wrap the cord around my ear to keep them in as others have suggested with this type of earbuds... they fit like standard earbuds. They do have slightly more weight than standard headphones because the speakers are halfway down the cords rather than in the ears, so I can see how it might be a little harder to keep them in during strenuous activity. The sound quality is comparable to regular headphones. The first order I received had one earbud that was much quieter than the other, like that speaker was defective/blown. They sent me a replacement immediately, and the new one doesn't have the same issue, so I believe it was an isolated issue.I have not yet tested them for EMF, but would have liked if the speakers were further away from my face while lying down. Lying down on my side with them in my ears, the speakers still rests on my neck, and I was having trouble finding a way to keep the speaker part from touching my skin. While sitting up, they are perfectly placed to keep the speakers from touching skin, but I would still like them farther from my body, but I imagine any longer distance between the speakers and the ear would impact sound quality. Still I'm sure it's less exposure than having them directly in my ears!I like that the cord is longer than standard headphones, as I can put my device further away from me on my desk.Volume/sound output is comparable to my standard headphones (in the side that works properly), meaning that I don't need to turn the volume up any higher than I normally would with standard headphones.I wish they had the option of a lightning cable connector for Apple devices. I have tested it with both an older iPad with the standard 3.5mm connection, as well as a lightning to 3.5mm adapter with a newer iPhone, and both work well.

I can hear well but can't adjust the volume enough on some calls. I wrote a question through the Amazon site asking if there is a danger if I use the headset with the cords not looped around the ear. The instruction paper says not to in that it has an x by that diagram. It shows that the wire to be looped behind each ear. Doing it that way is less comfortable, takes longer, and it keeps popping off. If there is no health issue, a customer should be allowed to wear ti without wrapping it behind the ear. Overall, it seems like a good product otherwise. My health concern question has not been sufficiently answered though. I read somewhere that it is wrapped around the ear so it won't fall off but wrapping it around the ear makes it pop off more. If it isn't a health issue, why isn't wearing it without looping around the ear an option?

This can substantially reduce EMR transmitted to your head, but the air tubes are only about 6 inches long. They have good sound and mic quality. I wish they had something to hook over the ear as the best I can get is having these precariously perched in my ears (they pop out even more when curled over my ears as per the manual), so I use a head wrap to keep them in place.As far as EMR reduction, since wires usually pickup and relay EMR there are still situations where using a speaker or even Bluetooth is still better than air-tube headsets. I have a Cornet ED88Tplus and have measured the following EMR using my cellphone (LG Tribute Dynasty) on 4G/LTE with the phone actively charging through a USB cable.:EMR at the Cellphone:RF: 815MHz frequency peaking at 1076 mW/m2 and averaging around 500 mW/m2Magnetic: ~25 mGE-Field: 500-1000 V/MEMR at the earbuds:RF: 815MHz frequency peaking at 19.2 mW/m2 and averaging around 4 mW/m2Magnetic: ~2 mGE-Field: ~2 V/MEMR at the mic:RF: 815MHz frequency peaking at 77.9 mW/m2 and averaging around 30 mW/m2Magnetic: ~25 mGE-Field: 200-1000 V/MEMR using Bluetooth (WAVE):RF: 2389 MHz frequency at about 25 mW/m2Magnetic: ~5 mGE-Field: 2-11 V/MDisabling LTE for calls (using 3G for calling and LTE for data while idle) gives initial EMR of near 1900 mW/m2 (LTE bursts when dialing and switching to and from 3G). During a 3G call I detected the following RF radiation (the Magnetic and E-Field remained similar to LTE):EMR at the Cellphone:RF: 815MHz frequency peaking at 230 mW/m2 and averaging around 100 mW/m2EMR at the earbuds:RF: undetectable against the high ambient RF radiation in my hotel (~0.3 mW/m2)EMR at the mic:RF: 815MHz frequency peaking at 1.9 mW/m2 and averaging around 0.3 mW/m2I would recommend these for most applications over Bluetooth headsets. Just keep in mind that the cable up to the mic can still transmit substantial amounts of EMR when using data services (4G or above).Edit: Why doesn't anyone make a Bluetooth adapter that can accept handset input?!? The closest I've found is adapters that have an audio out and a built-in microphone. Also found a lot of adapters that can't transmit and receive at the same time! (what is this, 2003?). Yes, adding more radio transmitters to my environment isn't great but considering the above measurements, EMR exposure would be even lower if these headsets were attached to a small Bluetooth transceiver rather than a powerful cellular radio.

One of the earbuds broke off of this just a month after I bought it, during normal, gentle use. My return window closed just two days ago! Wish I could receive a replacement.

These anti-radiation earphones may work for that purpose, but they wouldn't stay in my ears. Bad design - my opinion. The weight of the 2 controls located down the cables a little are very heavy, relative to the device as a whole and the earphones kept falling out. Never have had this problem with other earphones, headsets, AirPods, et al. Had to return these for that reason, even though I like the idea of anti-radiation!