The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers (Two Disc Theatrical Edition) [DVD] [2002]

As described .

Nothing to dislike about this film. if you are to think there is a issue with these movies, it's not the movies that are the issue, it's you 😉

Great film

Thanks

Great I have watched a million times but the extended version is a must there are brilliant scenes which are not available in normal version so I purchased extended version and did not regret

It was good

This film is absolutely incredible and The Lord of the Rings Trilogy is my favourite movie(s) of all time.The Amazon version loses one star though, because of a major sound issue, namely that there is no dialogue on the left channel (listening on headphones using my Kindle Fire 10 HD tablet). The soundtrack and sound effects are on both channels, but the dialogue is only on the right. This problem occurs both when streaming and playing the downloaded movie on the tablet.This is not a problem with "Fellowship of The Ring" or "Return of the King", the sound is fine on both of these (and every other movie and TV show on my Fire).I also tried streaming this movie on my laptop and the sound is fine on the laptop streaming version.I have reported this via customer service and they have said they will report it up so it can be fixed. They also kindly have refunded me on the purchase price.I hope that they fix it soon, because I absolutely love this film and the sound is magnificent usually.If other people experiencing the same issue could also contact customer services then hopefully Amazon will get this fixed sooner.

I got this version cos it's my favourite DVD of the series, worth buying!

Acheté pour la figurine surtout, pour un collectionneur. Belle figurine ! Beau coffret !

La trilogie de l'anneau continue après un premier opus excellent qui posait les bases de cette merveilleuse épopée. Dans cette suite, les membres de la Communauté se sont séparés mais chacun aura son importance dans la réussite de la mission. Les différents groupes formés vivront des aventures diverses mais chacune sera aussi intéressante que les autres. C'est d'ailleurs en suivant l'un des groupes, celui avec Aragorn, que l'on assistera à l'une des batailles épiques qui ont fait (en partie) la renommée de cette trilogie. La bataille du gouffre de Helm est impressionnante de par sa taille mais aussi par son ambiance. On tremble face à l'immense troupe adverse, on comprend que la lutte semble vaine face à une telle armée. La peur monte parmi les rangs et l'excitation grandit chez le spectateur. La nuit renforce le côté dramatique et terrifiant de cet affrontement. C'est à ce moment que le mot épique prend tout son sens, l'héroïsme des personnages est mis à l'épreuve et leur courage aussi. Comme dans le premier opus, les maquillages et effets spéciaux sont très réussis amplifiant le côté impressionnant et réalisme de la scène. Tout en assurant le spectacle de ce côté, le film ne perd pas de vue les autres personnages qui permettent de faire avancer e récit et faire de nouvelles rencontres comme les Ents et surtout Gollum, cette créature qui jouera un rôle essentiel dans la suite de l'histoire est l'une des autres grandes réussites de ce deuxième film. Grâce à la motion capture et au talent d'Andy Serkis, Gollum prend vie et semble faire partie intégrante du décor alors qu'il a pourtant été rajouté numériquement. Le pouvoir de l'anneau est visible dans ce deuxième volet, son influence sur les personnages grandit et cela est très bien montré. « Le Seigneur des anneaux : les deux tours » est plus impressionnant et imposant que le premier opus mais il n'oublie pas de faire avancer le récit autant que dans le premier film. Cette suite garde les éléments qui avaient fait le succès du précédent film, comme les décors et bien sûr la BO qui est une nouvelle magique, tout en étant plus épique.

I am sure that there are those who are bothered, angry even, that Peter Jackson didn't take a more literal approach to his "Lord of the Rings" films. To those people I would say that a literal word for word translation from text to screen (assuming such a thing were possible, which it's not) would be nothing but mimicry and in no way a tribute to Tolkien's genius. Rather, I would argue that Jackson's superb interpretation of "The Two Towers" beautifully captures the spirit of Tolkien without being slavish in its devotion. Moreover, Jackson successfully grounds his film in a recognizable reality, which serves to further engage the viewer.There are three ways (generally speaking) in which Jackson puts his fingerprint on Tolkien. The first is his interpretation of the text; areas in which without changing Tolkien he is nonetheless able to put his own spin on the text. There are two salient and superb examples of this that come immediately to mind. The first is that Jackson presents Gollum/Smeagol as a split personality. Gollum is a malevolent deceitful being who lusts after the ring, and Smeagol is an almost childlike creature, fierce in his devotion, but easily hurt. I found this approach to be utterly compelling, and a superb way to present Gollum, but at the same time, it is totally loyal to Tolkien's writing. The second example is the presentation of Gandalf freeing Theoden from Saruman as a sort of exorcism. Not only was this a visually intriguing way to present the scene, but it also shows great appreciation for Tolkien as a man. As a devout Catholic, I suspect he would have appreciated the overtones that swirl about the exchange.The second way in which Jackson captures Tolkien is in his portrayal of the characters. Given the constraints of the film format, the director is forced to both condense and flesh out various characters and exchanges. As such, it is critical that he portrays the characters appropriately, but within the context of the movie. There are any number of excellent examples to Jackson's characterizations, but there are a few that come immediately to mind. The first is using Gimli as much needed comic relief, but doing so in such a way that doesn't degrade the character. In fact, it has quite the opposite effect as it lends a certain emotional depth to the stalwart dwarf. Another example is the conflicted Theoden who is almost Shakespearean in his portrayal. Particularly moving was when at Theodred's grave he flatly states, "No parent should have to bury their child" and then breaks down. Finally, Eowyn's unrequited love for Aragorn is nicely captured, and largely without any dialogue, using glances and expressions to convey the story.Finally, there is Jackson's modification of Tolkien in order to both make the story work as a film and ground it in our present day reality. Most surprising among these is the appearance of the Elves at Helm's Deep, as they come to honor the old alliances. While completely absent from Tolkien's writing, I found this to be an excellent and effective modification. By introducing the Elves, Jackson is able to paint a portrait of Allies fighting against a common enemy in the World War II sense. Moreover, the elite Elves and Rohirrim fighting side by side against overwhelming odds echoes Thermopylae, where the grossly outnumbered Spartans saved Greece, and ultimately, Western Civilization, from the Persians. The second approach is more subtle, but completely pervasive as Jackson takes a fantasy war and couches it in familiar terms. For example there is a suicide bombing at one point during the Battle of Helm's Deep. While entirely within the context of Tolkien, Jackson's presentation rather brutally echoes our own dangerous world. Another fine example is Theoden's question, "What can men do against such reckless hate?" which rather succinctly captures the dilemma of fighting terrorism.My only two complaints are relatively small. The first is an entirely unnecessary dream sequence between Arwen and Aragorn which badly distracts from the mounting tension between him and Eowyn. The second is that while Faramir is ultimately true to the book, it takes far too long for him to realize the danger of the ring. Part of the beauty of his character is how he stands in contrast to his brother Boromir, and this is somewhat eroded by Jackson's interpretation.As for the discs themselves, they are everything one would expect based upon the first set, as the sound, picture and score are all superb. Furthermore, I found the additional scenes to be generally excellent. Theodred's funeral, which features a lament by Eowyn, was particularly moving. Also, through the addition of a few key scenes, I found the ending to be far more satisfying. The conclusions to the Battles of Helms Deep an Isengard are less abrupt, and Faramir is better rounded out.The extras are likewise superb and every bit as fascinating as the features from the first set. I'm not one who is easily drawn in by commetary on costumes and make-up, but these discs are so comprehensive it is impossible not to be drawn in by them. Finally, the audio commentaries are likewise comprehensive and interesting.If you are looking for a slavish recreation of Tolkien's work, you would do well to pass on these discs. However, if you appreciate the spirit of Tolkien's work, and fine filmmaking, you would do well to watch this film. Furthermore, you will never find a better value, as the extra's included in this four disc set once again set the standard to which all other releases must strive.Enjoy!Jake Mohlman

Got these movies in DVD Fullscreen. They took a few weeks to arrive, but there was no damage. Casing and disks are excellent condition, and play well with no problems.Special features bonus disks work properly too.

Conforme à la description