Real Men Bulge Enhancing Pouch Underwear for Men – 1, 3 and 6 Pack Set - Modal Boxer Briefs ABCD Pouch

Specs for reference:163lb5’630” waistAthletic/muscularMy ONLY quarrel between these 3” and the 7” trunks are that one can be too long and the other too short. I REALLYYYY WISH they had a 5” trunk 🙏 I like wearing my gym shorts and not have to roll a 7” trunk up to hide it and not pick a 3” short out of my butt. Maybe it’s just me because I do squats and look double cheeked up on a Thursday afternoon, but I need a 5” trunk. Real Men MAKE IT HAPPEN PLEASE!! For this reason, it took a while to find the correct size and have my ego checked lolI went with an XL for the waist since I don’t like my underwear squeezing my hips and a cup size A. I’m a grower not a shower and previously had a B cup and it felt great 80% of the time (when everything wanted to be outside of my body) but I really needed something that would fit closer to 100% of the time and the A certainly did. I previously had the nylon version of these and hated how hot and moist everything would get so I’m glad they switched to modal; heat no longer gets trapped and I’m not at moist anymore which is amazing. I like colors, but I do wish the bright colors had been available so the XL in size A. Overall, they look and feel great I need to buy more.

Great fit. Ordered the C size pouch might have to go up to the D size pouch. Love how my package just slides into the pouch when I pull them up. They really keep you cool and comfortable all day long. I work in a warehouse without AC. Love, love,love. Highly recommended for guys that are tired of that hot, wet feeling. As well as your balls sticking to your leg. You will not be disappointed. Telling all the guys I know to buy these.

I purchased the trunks, D pouch.Pro: Front is amazing. Order larger than what you think. (For example I am medium or large normally, but on this brand I would be XL - 5’10” 170 lbs). They look *great.* Fabric feels excellent. D pouch is a solid choice if you are well endowed.Cons: You get a wedgie with the slightest movement. You would have to readjust constantly, which is a problem because you can’t pull down the legs very easily in the back. Therefore I decided to return them. The performance briefs did not have that problem with me (same size) so I think it’s just the way the trunks were designed.I can’t comment on the quality as I never wore them around and don’t know how they would hold up overtime.Fair value for money. They are expensive, but if the back was not a problem I would consider it worth it.

Spoiler alert: rm w fly is the best!I was all in on separatec for awhile, but it’s too complicated and if you’re stuff isn’t exactly the size they estimate, you spend a lot of time adjusting.Big fan of saxx. A thin layer separates your stuff from your body and your stuff has slightly more room than most pouches. And saxx does this better than Tommy John and Hanes. The thin layer separating my stuff started to chafe once I started using this for regular underwear and sleep underwear. It was fine when I used sax for daytime and had regular, non special boxer briefs for sleepRM seems the best. Instead of a thin layer and a slightly bigger pouch, it’s a much bigger pouch and you don’t need a separating layer. Instead of getting support by having your stuff pressed against you, the support comes from your stuff resting on a horizontal pouch of fabric. Way more comfortable.I tried the RM 7” with and without the fly. The fly works well. Doesn’t seem to compromise anything. Both are low rise, but the ones without the fly are lower.At 1st this was weird, but it is more comfortable for the underwear to bind below your belt than binding at the same place as your pants and belt. No problem with the legs riding up. The ones without the fly are so low that I feel a little uncomfortable when I bend over.The RMs with a fly have a silky feel; nonfly is cottony (they’re both made of the same material). With fly, the waistband is set within the silky material while the nonfly has the more simple, traditional waistband (which I found less comfortable). Without the fly, the pouch seems to hang a little lower, making it important to get the proper pouch size. Maybe it’s because of the way the fly is cut, but the pouch seems to droop less with the fly.I had some trouble figuring out what was for me and found some photos confusing so here’s info to help (as of 6/10/25):In the product photos, the 1st one indicates whether the set you’re ordering has a fly or not. If you change your color, you gotta recheck that 1st photo. Also, on one of my pair, the photo did not match the color description. The photo showed black, medium gray, and medium blue. The words said black, navy, and dark gray. The words were right.

I've been looking for a new pair of pouch underwear to replace my existing pairs. I've tried many different brands from $5 to $55 per pair and nothing fit right or the pouch was too small. But this brand is perfect in everyway, may I even say better than my old favorite one I have. I love the fit, material, and especially love the pouch size. I'm a C pouch but decided on the B because I like my jewels to be in a tighter pouch. The pouch does stretch so it's not too tight but I know with some use, it will loosen a bit and feel perfectly.I was hesitant about getting a medium because I'm a small in underwear but the suggested size, on the size chart, is perfect.

I love the pouch very supportive, but the legs ride and that drives me up a wall.I've purchased two styles this one doesn't have a flap for the junk so you will have to pull down the boxers to use the bathroom.They are nice but they definitely need to work on the legs not rising so much.